- #1
ahmeds
- 6
- 1
- TL;DR Summary
- Plasma ball ligting
Is the cause of the lighting due to the impact of electrons with the nucleus
No.ahmeds said:TL;DR Summary: Plasma ball ligting
Is the cause of the lighting due to the impact of electrons with the nucleus
No, not the nucleus.ahmeds said:Is the cause of the lighting due to the impact of electrons with the nucleus
Imo that's a bit sweeping. If there are ionised Hydrogen atoms about, there 'could' be an interaction with a proton (H+ ion / nucleus).Baluncore said:No, not the nucleus.
This is not about any hydrogen ions that might be about.sophiecentaur said:Imo that's a bit sweeping. If there are ionised Hydrogen atoms about, there 'could' be an interaction with a proton (H+ ion / nucleus).
To quote Wikipedia, the sphere is; "filled with noble gases, usually a mixture of neon, krypton, and xenon".sophiecentaur said:Visible lines tend to be produced from interaction with ions, other than Hydrogen, that are only partly ionised.
Baluncore said:This is not about any hydrogen ions that might be about.
We are discussing a real toy / cheap demo with a mixture of gases. It would be unlikely that the contents of the globe would be of high purity. The law of diminishing returns applies and this gadget has to sell at a reasonable price. The contents would be of similar purity to common or garden balloon gas. (Not so easy to come by these days.)Baluncore said:To quote Wikipedia, the sphere is; "filled with noble gases, usually a mixture of neon, krypton, and xenon".
That is correct. The gas mix is unimportant, so long as it works. Any UV emitted will not be "seen" directly, but may increase the ionisation of the plasma, which may then emit visible light.sophiecentaur said:We are discussing a real toy / cheap demo with a mixture of gases.
This was a beginners question, so I went for understanding the basic principle. The "impact of electrons with the nucleus", needed to be clearly eliminated, before understanding the quantum physics of visible light.sophiecentaur said:But my problem was with your categorical "no" about electrons hitting a nucleus. The "no" is a sweeping statement and could be mis-leading. That's all.
Yes but a 'sufficient' answer would not usually be a minimalist answer. A beginner would surely need to have it pointed out that only one electron would be missing from an atom. That would mean that the collision would involve interaction with the nucleus and the rest of the electrons. It costs nothing to expand on the word "no", particularly when helping a beginner. We know that a recombining electron goes nowhere near the nucleus.Baluncore said:This was a beginners question, so I went for understanding the basic principle. The "impact of electrons with the nucleus", needed to be clearly eliminated, before understanding the quantum physics of visible light.
berkeman said:No.
sophiecentaur said:It costs nothing to expand on the word "no", particularly when helping a beginner.
Baluncore said:No, not the nucleus.
YES.sophiecentaur said:We know that a recombining electron goes nowhere near the nucleus.