Higgs Field & GR: Are They Related or Not?

In summary, the conversation revolves around the relationship between the Higgs field and general relativity (GR). The OP suggests that since mass is a common core in both pillars of science, there may be a causal relationship between them. However, experts clarify that "matter" in GR actually refers to stress-energy, not just rest mass, and the Higgs mechanism is only one way a quantum field can acquire mass. Therefore, there is no direct causal relationship between the Higgs field and GR. This is further supported by Samalkhaiat's challenge #002, which explores the mathematics of GR and QFT.
  • #1
Dennis Plews
36
4
TL;DR Summary
Higgs Field and GR
Since these two pillars of science have mass as a common core, are they related, essentially the same or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dennis Plews said:
these two pillars of science have mass as a common core
What do you mean by that?
 
  • #3
Moderator's note: Thread title edited.
 
  • #4
I don't know what you mean by that either, but I am pretty sure the answer is "no".
 
  • #5
No they are not the same
 
  • #6
It's clear what the OP meant; "Higgs field creates mass" and "mass creates gravity", so there could be a relation between Higgs and gravity. Of course, both claims in quotation marks originate from oversimplified and misleading explanations in pop-sci literature. Neither claim is really true, and there is no relation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ersmith, PeterDonis, Motore and 2 others
  • #7
Demystifier said:
It's clear what the OP meant
Maybe it seems that way to you, but the person who should be clarifying and explaining what the OP meant is the OP. @Dennis Plews please clarify what you meant, as has already been requested. Otherwise this thread will be deleted.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #8
PeterDonis said:
What do you mean by that?
To use a famous quote: “Matter tells spacetime how to curve and spacetime tells matter how to move.” Here I am converting Prof Wheeler’s “matter” to what I consider to be a fair substitute, mass. Mass is now understood to be field excitations that have a positive coupling constant with the Higgs field and thus acquire the property know as mass. Hence it seems fair to inquire of experts if such Higgs couplings are causally related to GR.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #9
Dennis Plews said:
“Matter tells spacetime how to curve and spacetime tells matter how to move.”
Ok so far. But:

Dennis Plews said:
Here I am converting Prof Wheeler’s “matter” to what I consider to be a fair substitute, mass.
This is not correct. What "matter" actually means, when you unpack what GR actually says, is "stress-energy". Rest mass is only part of stress-energy, and things that have zero rest mass, like EM radiation, still have stress-energy and are still a source of spacetime curvature (and of course also still get told by spacetime how to move).

Dennis Plews said:
Mass is now understood to be field excitations that have a positive coupling constant with the Higgs field and thus acquire the property know as mass.
This is garbled. The Higgs mechanism is only one possible way that a quantum field can have mass. But in any case, "mass" in this case means "rest mass" (or invariant mass, which is a better term), and, as above, that is not the same thing as stress-energy.

Dennis Plews said:
Hence it seems fair to inquire of experts if such Higgs couplings are causally related to GR.
And the answer is no. See above and previous responses.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Dennis Plews and PeroK
  • #11
malawi_glenn said:
No they are not the same
Of course they are not the same. The question is whether they’re connected via their common core of mass. Has anyone examined this commonality to see if they are connected? The first thing that comes to my mind as a possible nexus is the stress energy tensor
 
  • #12
Dennis Plews said:
Of course they are not the same. The question is whether they’re connected via their common core of mass. Has anyone examined this commonality to see if they are connected? The first thing that comes to my mind as a possible nexus is the stress energy tensor
OK, it appears that @Demystifier did indeed understand your question properly when he answered it in post #6 above. I don’t think we can much improve on his answer there.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #13
Dennis Plews said:
Of course they are not the same. The question is whether they’re connected via their common core of mass. Has anyone examined this commonality to see if they are connected? The first thing that comes to my mind as a possible nexus is the stress energy tensor
See my post #9, which already addressed this (wrong) "possible nexus".
 
  • #14
PeterDonis said:
Maybe it seems that way to you, but the person who should be clarifying and explaining what the OP meant is the OP. @Dennis Plews please clarify what you meant, as has already been requested. Otherwise this thread will be deleted.
This is what I was asking:
[ATTACH type="full" alt="Demystifier"]339725[/ATTACH]

Demystifier






It's clear what the OP meant; "Higgs field creates mass" and "mass creates gravity", so there could be a relation between Higgs and gravity. Of course, both claims in quotation marks originate from oversimplified and misleading explanations in pop-sci literature. Neither claim is really true, and there is no relation.
 
  • #15
Dennis Plews said:
This is what I was asking
Your link is to Demystifier's PF user page, which contains nothing relevant to this discussion.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
933
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
677
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
682
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
400
Back
Top