Are there any unsolved physics problems?

In summary: Well, I think it's called the "standard model" because it is currently the most widely accepted and experimentally validated theory of particle physics. It is a combination of the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces, and it has been able to accurately predict the behavior of particles and their interactions. As for why it is on Ginzburg's list, it is likely because it was still being developed and refined at the time and was considered a major area of research and discovery in physics. But as science and technology have advanced, the standard model has also been refined and expanded upon.
  • #1
John_Williams
2
1
I was curious if there were any unsolved physics problems and if so which is the most important or intriguing. I have been meaning to contribute to the scientific field in some capacity and I think solving an unresolved issue in physics could do just that. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
@shyboy posted this here in 2005. When you are finished solving these, post here again and we'll give you some more.

Here is the list proposed by a Nobel laureate V. Ginzubrg
1. Controlled nuclear fusion.
2. High-temperature and room-temperature superconductivity.
3. Metallic hydrogen. Other exotic substances.
4. Two-dimensional electron liquid & the anomalous
Hall effect and other effects.
5. Some questions of solid-state physics & heterostructures
in semiconductors, quantum wells and dots,
metal-dielectric transitions, charge- and spindensity
waves, mesoscopics.
6. Second-order and related phase transitions. Some
examples of such transitions. Cooling sin particular,
laser cooling to superlow temperatures. Bose-
Einstein condensation in gases.
7. Surface physics. Clusters.
8. Liquid crystals. Ferroelectrics. Ferrotoroics.
9. Fullerenes. Nanotubes.
10. The behavior of matter in superstrong magnetic
fields.
11. Nonlinear physics. Turbulence. Solitons. Chaos.
Strange attractors.
12. X-ray lasers, gamma-ray lasers, superhigh-power lasers.
13. Superheavy elements. Exotic nuclei.
14. Mass spectrum. Quarks and gluons. Quantum chromodynamics.
Quark-gluon plasma.
15. Unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions.
W± and Z0 bosons. Leptons.
16. Standard Model. Grand unification. Superunification.
Proton decay. Neutrino mass. Magnetic monopoles.
17. Fundamental length. Particle interaction at high and
superhigh energies. Colliders.
18. Nonconservation of CP invariance.
19. Nonlinear phenomena in vacuum and in superstrong
magnetic fields. Phase transitions in a vacuum.
20. Strings. M theory.
21. Experimental verification of the general theory of
relativity.
22. Gravitational waves and their detection.
23. The cosmological problem. Inflation. The L term
and “quintessence.” Relationship between cosmology
and high-energy physics.
24. Neutron stars and pulsars. Supernova stars.
25. Black holes. Cosmic strings.
26. Quasars and galactic nuclei. Formation of galaxies.
27. The problem of dark matter & hidden mass and its
detection.
28. The origin of superhigh-energy cosmic rays.
29. Gamma-ray bursts. Hypernovae.
30. Neutrino physics and astronomy. Neutrino
oscillations.
V. L. Ginzburg
Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 981-998 (2004)
or

Vitalii L Ginzburg, "On some advances in physics and astronomy over the past three years ", Phys. Usp., 2002, 45 (2), 205-211.
'But my favorite was this:
"What happens to all those pens, and socks?"

--Chi Meson

Edit: Also check the list of similar thread titles at the bottom of this page.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes SammyS, PhDeezNutz, DeBangis21 and 5 others
  • #4
anorlunda said:
15. Unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions.
W± and Z0 bosons. Leptons.
15. Well the Higgs boson was discovered in 2012, so I do not know really if that is what Ginzburg had in mind?
anorlunda said:
21. Experimental verification of the general theory of
relativity.
22. Gravitational waves and their detection.
21. what expeirmental verification? There have been several experimental verifications of GR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity
22. Done in 2015 (indirectly from Pulsars in the 1970's - Nobel prize 1993)
 
  • #5
Two things about that list: 1) it was written 20 years ago, and 2) it was written by a man in his late 80s.

As a result, I’d say very few of the items on that list can still be regarded as “unsolved,” with some having essentially been solved well before the list was written (fullerenes were discovered in 1985, for instance, and the Nobel was awarded in 1996–I worked on fullerenes in the late 2000s as a grad student, when it was already a dying field).

One wide open area that basically didn’t exist at the time of Ginzburg’s list is the statistical mechanics and thermodynamics of active matter. A lot of really interesting work is being done in this area, with crossover into nanoscience and biophysics (the latter of which is conspicuously absent from Ginzburg’s list). Just my 2 cents.

John_Williams said:
I have been meaning to contribute to the scientific field in some capacity and I think solving an unresolved issue in physics could do just that.
I like your alacrity, but prepare to be disappointed. You will go further by pursuing work you’re interested in, without regard to the prestige of the problem you’re solving, than by the converse.
 
  • #6
TeethWhitener said:
and 2) it was written by a man in his late 80s.
and your point?
 
  • #7
gleem said:
and your point?
I don't know what his point was, but one good point was that his perspective was formed 50 or 60 years before, so could be up to 80 years old.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes gleem
  • #8
TeethWhitener said:
Two things about that list: 1) it was written 20 years ago, and 2) it was written by a man in his late 80s.
I know that, but the list was posted as a serious response to OP's question.
 
  • #9
Why the Standard Model of particles? And not something else?
 
  • #10
Maarten Havinga said:
Why the Standard Model of particles? And not something else?
Could you elaborate on the question? Do you mean why the standard model is THE way we describe particle physics, or do you mean why it is on that list?

The standard model is quite a bad name, it is really called the Weinberg-Glashow-Salam model. Let's say we find another particle which was predicted by model "X". Five or so years from the discovery of such, model "X" will be called the standard model.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #11
Sorry Slight tangent- I read his list (metallic Hydrogen?? What?)

As a non-physicist I think I could have a good crack a few big ones from spending so much time on here

The phrasing would be non- technical but I absolutely have to have a go at this!

My list

What happened at T=0?

Was there a T = -1? -2? etc

What is the solution to the flatness problem?

Is inflation correct?

Is the universe spatially infinite?

Is the universe temporally infinite

Why are there no monopoles?

Where is all the anti- matter?

Are there supersymmetric particles ?

Is string theory (version of) correct?

Is there a single fundamental particle?

What is solution to the Hubble problem? Tension? What’s the solution?

What is required to unify QM and GR?

What happens inside a black hole?

What is a measurement?

What is an observer?

What is the correct interpretation of QM?
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and dextercioby
  • #12
John_Williams said:
I have been meaning to contribute to the scientific field in some capacity and I think solving an unresolved issue in physics could do just that.
Are you saying you are going to do "research" on your spare-time or are you thinking about where to apply for grad-school?
 
  • #13
Many properties of neutrinos are not known including how neutrino mass arises.

The cause of the phenomena attributed to dark matter is not well understood.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes malawi_glenn and dextercioby
  • #14
John_Williams said:
I was curious if there were any unsolved physics problems and if so which is the most important or intriguing. I have been meaning to contribute to the scientific field in some capacity and I think solving an unresolved issue in physics could do just that. Thanks!
The things that immediately come to my mind are (far from exhaustive of course):
  1. quark confinement: how to derive this from QCD?
  2. what does any sort of "quantum gravity" look like? In any case: how to merge quantum theory and gravitation?
  3. is there dark matter? What is its nature? do we actually really need it?
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #15
ohwilleke said:
Many properties of neutrinos are not known including how neutrino mass arises.
I don't understand people who say "we understand the standard model"... poor little neutrinos ν :cry: We don't even know if they are Dirac or Majorana!
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #16
John_Williams said:
which is the most important or intriguing
I think normally as you study physics and build your own understanding, you will see what questions that are most important and intriguing for you, which may well be different than that others think.

/Fredrik
 
  • #17
anorlunda said:
@shyboy posted this here in 2005. When you are finished solving these, post here again and we'll give you some more.'But my favorite was this:
"What happens to all those pens, and socks?"

--Chi Meson

Edit: Also check the list of similar thread titles at the bottom of this page.
After a search through the literature I can confirm that the pen problem (sometimes referred to as "the pen question." Where the hell is my pen!? That's two in two days!) was actually solved in 1978 by Douglas Adams.

“Somewhere in the cosmos, he said, along with all the planets inhabited by humanoids, reptiloids, fishoids, walking treeoids and superintelligent shades of the color blue, there was also a planet entirely given over to ballpoint life forms. And it was to this planet that unattended ballpoints would make their way, slipping away quietly through wormholes in space to a world where they knew they could enjoy a uniquely ballpointoid lifestyle, responding to highly ballpoint-oriented stimuli, and generally leading the ballpoint equivalent of the good life.”
 
  • Love
Likes ohwilleke
  • #18
I'd like to find the planet of the 10mm sockets.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes SammyS, Nugatory, ohwilleke and 1 other person
  • #19
The sock problem is long solved. They cling to the inside of the dryer due to static. I go to laundromats and check the dryers. Checking ten dryers can often net you three or four unmatched socks. All freshly laundered.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes hutchphd, ohwilleke, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #20
Grelbr42 said:
The sock problem is long solved. They cling to the inside of the dryer due to static. I go to laundromats and check the dryers. Checking ten dryers can often net you three or four unmatched socks. All freshly laundered.
It's someone else's socks though. Someone else's feet ..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #21
Yes, many unsolved problems. Our current models are limited in scope since experiments can only test up to certain energies and certain length scales. Our knowledge of the extremely large (cosmology, dark energy, etc.) and the extremely high energy (beyond standard model energy scales) is very limited. No one knows what happens beyond the cosmological horizon, what happened 1 femtosecond after the big bang, if other universes exist, or what happens when you smash particles together at 10^26 eV. We have no way to test any of that. We also have no way to test for extremely low mass particles that do not interact appreciably with normal matter. We could have many different kinds and have no clue.
 
  • #22
You could try to figure out what space is actually made of. That would be an awesome contribution.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
  • #23
Grelbr42 said:
The sock problem is long solved. They cling to the inside of the dryer due to static. I go to laundromats and check the dryers. Checking ten dryers can often net you three or four unmatched socks. All freshly laundered.
Yes, BUT ... what you're not pointing out is that those socks were magically transmitted from another city or country which is where they were lost in the first place. OUR socks get the same treatment and end up elsewhere.
 
  • Haha
Likes ohwilleke
  • #24
Pair reduction -- It's the opposite of pair production.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #25
Jodo said:
You could try to figure out what space is actually made of. That would be an awesome contribution.
You're assuming that space is actually made of something. Big assumption.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and ohwilleke
  • #27
Jodo said:
t what space is actually made
Call it fribbitz. Then you'd need to know what fribbitz is made of. Apologies. Actually made of.

Then its turtles all the way down.
 
  • Like
Likes kered rettop and ohwilleke
  • #28
Should someone call John and check his progress? It’s been a couple of years, he should have solved one by now.
 
  • #30
n
Vanadium 50 said:
Call it fribbitz. Then you'd need to know what fribbitz is made of. Apologies. Actually made of.

Then its turtles all the way down.
Correction. It's turtles all the way down until you reach the end.
 
  • #31
kered rettop said:
Correction. It's turtles all the way down until you reach the end.
I think you missed the point.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, gmax137 and Vanadium 50
  • #32
phinds said:
Yes, BUT ... what you're not pointing out is that those socks were magically transmitted from another city or country which is where they were lost in the first place. OUR socks get the same treatment and end up elsewhere.
I have never lost a sock. That's something I'm very proud of!

I've lost several shirts and a pair of trousers vanished. But, never a sock .
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes ohwilleke, pinball1970 and gmax137
  • #33
PeroK said:
I have never lost a sock. That's something I'm very proud of!
Statistically close to impossible. Even women lose socks.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #34
phinds said:
I think you missed the point.
I think you did.
 
  • #35
kered rettop said:
I think you did.
There's a lot of stuff that's not known right now and the science community are working on it. It is very interesting and takes a lot text book reading to get anywhere near what they are actually looking at. Some of that community are on here.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

A Unsolved Problems in Near Surface Geophysics
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
452
Other Questions about physics and math unsolved problems
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
23
Views
2K
I A question with regard to Hooke's and Kepler's laws
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
24
Views
633
Is time real (in a physical sense)?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Why Do Physicists Use Gaussian Error Distributions?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Andy Meadowcroft - Introduction (and a question about nuclear fusion)
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
12
Views
1K
I Changing or breaking the most fundamental laws and symmetries?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Thinking about a calendar epoch based on the field of physics
    • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
49
Views
3K
A What are your insights on The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever?
    • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Expert Tips for Solving Physics Problems | Ace Your Finals in 6 Days!
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
11
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top