How is the derivative of an inexact differential defined?

  • #1
spin_100
15
1
IMG_20230914_172646.jpg

This is from Callen's thermodynamics. What does the differentiation with respect to T means for an inexact differential like dQ. Also why is T treated as a constant if we start by replacing dQ by TdS? Any references to the relevant mathematics will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
spin_100 said:
This is from Callen's thermodynamics. What does the differentiation with respect to T means for an inexact differential like dQ.
I am a little rusty but I think that this should not be interpreted as a differentiation but as a ratio of two incremental changes in values. In this case the change in the heat of a system d'Q * that occurs when the temperature increases by dT at a temperature of T.
[tex] \frac{d'Q}{dt }\neq \frac{d}{dt}\left ( Q \right )[/tex]


* Thermodynamics by Sears always distinguishes inexact differentials with a prime superscript on d indicating a small change in the value of the quantity..
 
  • #4
gleem said:
this should not be interpreted as a differentiation but as a ratio of two incremental changes in values.
Exactly.
 
  • #5
spin_100 said:
Also why is T treated as a constant if we start by replacing dQ by TdS?
The formula ##d'Q=TdS## does not imply that ##T## is constant.

For analogy, consider classical mechanics of a particle moving in one dimension. The infinitesimal path ##dx## during the time ##dt## is ##dx=vdt##, but it does not imply that the velocity ##v(t)## is constant. Instead, it means that ##v(t)## is defined as
$$v(t)=\frac{dx(t)}{dt}$$
which physicists write in the infinitesimal form ##dx=vdt##.

Indeed, similarly to ##v##, the ##T## can also be thought of as defined by a derivative formula. But it is not ##T=d'Q/dS## or ##T=dQ/dS##, because such things are not defined as derivatives. Instead, starting from the 1st law of thermodynamics
$$dU=TdS-PdV$$
we see that ##U## must be a function of ##S## and ##V##, because then we have the mathematical identity
$$dU(S,V)=\left( \frac{\partial U(S,V)}{\partial S} \right)_V dS +
\left( \frac{\partial U(S,V)}{\partial V} \right)_S dV$$
which is compatible with the 1st law above. The compatibility implies that ##T## can be defined as
$$T(S,V)=\left( \frac{\partial U(S,V)}{\partial S} \right)_V$$
which is a function of ##S## and ##V##, not a constant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, gleem and PeroK

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
452
Replies
1
Views
791
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top