- #1
rulmismo
- 7
- 0
Hi,
I have some question regarding windings on induction motors, if anybody can help.
Reviewing some literature (*), the usual formulae to get the number of turns per phase of a induction motor winding is
My question is regarding the flux to be used. Most of the books and references I found talk in this equation of a "per pole" flux, but voltage in the formulae is phase voltage (and you can have several poles per phase winding), so my current understanding is:
- if p=1 (2 pole machine), Nph shall be concentrated in one winding, and flux involved is the "mean" of the whole machine
- if p=2,(4 pole machine), flux loading (Bmean) must be the same so I think:
if poles are feed in paralel (is this the usual case?), Npole=Nphase of the p=1 machine, to keep same flux loading.
if poles are feed in series, Npole=Nphase/p, to keep same flux loading (so same total turns, but distributed between the poles.)
- p=3....
I would appreciate any insight or correction, any reference to a worked example of higher pole machine design or windings could also help.
Thanks!
(*) References just in case can help anybody
ref1
ref2
ref3
I have some question regarding windings on induction motors, if anybody can help.
Reviewing some literature (*), the usual formulae to get the number of turns per phase of a induction motor winding is
- Eph= RMS phase voltage [V]
- Nph= number of turns of phase winding
- f= frequency [Hz]
- FL="involved" flux (typically set by a limit of Bmean * involved area, being Bmean about 0.7T for a typical machine) [Wb]
- p=number of pole pairs
- K= winding factor
My question is regarding the flux to be used. Most of the books and references I found talk in this equation of a "per pole" flux, but voltage in the formulae is phase voltage (and you can have several poles per phase winding), so my current understanding is:
- if p=1 (2 pole machine), Nph shall be concentrated in one winding, and flux involved is the "mean" of the whole machine
- if p=2,(4 pole machine), flux loading (Bmean) must be the same so I think:
if poles are feed in paralel (is this the usual case?), Npole=Nphase of the p=1 machine, to keep same flux loading.
if poles are feed in series, Npole=Nphase/p, to keep same flux loading (so same total turns, but distributed between the poles.)
- p=3....
I would appreciate any insight or correction, any reference to a worked example of higher pole machine design or windings could also help.
Thanks!
(*) References just in case can help anybody
ref1
ref2
ref3