Power Tower in Space: Feasibility & Practicality

In summary, building a large power tower to beam power to Earth from space would be a difficult engineering project with many potential problems.
  • #1
MacIntoShiba
7
1
Hello,

I'm wondering about the practicality and feasibility of building large power tower structures in space.

I could imagine something like follows:

Take a long structural beam which is positioned in alignment to the sun rays. At the end closest to the sun a receiver is placed. Consisting of a cylinder consisting of hundreds of small tubes. Running also parallel to the sun rays. At the bottom a cool medium is compressed and enters (some kind of gas), travels through these tubes and heats up till it exits heated at the top to perhaps 700degC. The medium enters a turbine which also drives the compressor and excess mechanical power is converted to electricity. The expanded medium is transported by a tube to the end of the structural beam and fed through radiators which radiate away excess heat. Perhaps it would be possible to add another lower temperature cycle to increase efficiency.

At the other end of the main structural beam more structural beams are at an 90deg angle with the main structural beam and they spread out like the spokes of a wheel. Between the spokes cables are strung.

Mirrors consisting of reflective foil are placed at various intervals and connected to the spokes. These mirrors reflect the light onto the receiver.

The whole structure slowly rotates along the axis of the main structural beam so as to enhance positional stability.

The structure could rotate around the earth at a geostationary orbit and beam power back to earth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sounds great, but I have a few minor questions about the details.

You need to sketch the design, so we can see how much material is involved. All that material must be launched and economically assembled in space.

A disc can be stabilised by spinning on its axis, but not a long thin spindle or beam structure. A long, thin structure will alternately flip end over end, cyclically between modes.

Exactly how do you get the electricity to where it will be used?

A geostationary orbit is expensive because it is a long way up (36,000 km, 22,000 miles), and is populated by communication satellites.

There will be recurring outages. Geostationary satellites pass through the shadow of the Earth because the Earth's orbital plane about the Sun is close (23.4°) to the equatorial plane of the Earth.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes topsquark, Lnewqban and dlgoff
  • #3
One way to decide if building it in space is economical is that it costs about (factor of 2 or so, depending on the details) the same to launch something as it does to make it out of gold.

Does your idea pass that test?
 
  • Like
Likes Rive, sophiecentaur and topsquark
  • #4
MacIntoShiba said:
I'm wondering about the practicality and feasibility of building large power tower structures in space.
We don't currently have anything like that engineering capability.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, russ_watters, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #5
PeroK said:
We don't currently have anything like that engineering capability.
When any such system comes into your head (thoughts in the shower etc.) then here's a good feasibility test. In Earth's orbital position, every meter squared receives about 1kW of solar power. So you decide what power you need - say 10TW (to be worth while) and that tells you the sort of area your collecting structure would need, which shows you would need around 1010 m2 of collecting area. That's a lot bigger than we have managed so far - but give it time.
 
  • #6
Why would you want to have such a structure in space? Moving parts make it likely to fail, and cooling the cool end is a big problem in space. On Earth maintenance is easier and you can use the environment for cooling. You also save the launch costs.
sophiecentaur said:
say 10TW (to be worth while)
To be worthwhile, a power plant would need to exceed Earth's global electricity production by a factor 5?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #7
mfb said:
On Earth maintenance is easier and you can use the environment for cooling. You also save the launch costs.
That's been my view about nearly all these proposed space borne projects. Anyone would think that we are actually short of real estate down here on Earth. There are so may Engineering problems involved with shifting Power from one place to another and they're all much harder when you're trying to 'beam' if from place to place over vast distances in space.

It's fine to discuss extreme future fiction / fact but the caveats should always be stated first.
 

1. What is a Power Tower in Space?

A Power Tower in Space is a theoretical structure that would orbit the Earth and collect solar energy to be transmitted back to the surface for use as electricity. It would consist of a large tower with solar panels attached to it, and would be positioned to constantly receive sunlight.

2. Is a Power Tower in Space feasible?

While the concept of a Power Tower in Space is theoretically possible, it is currently not feasible due to technological limitations and high costs. However, with advancements in technology and materials, it may become a more viable option in the future.

3. How would a Power Tower in Space be built?

A Power Tower in Space would likely be built in space using robots and automated construction techniques. The materials and components would be transported to space using rockets or other means, and then assembled in orbit.

4. What are the potential benefits of a Power Tower in Space?

A Power Tower in Space could provide a constant and abundant source of clean energy, as well as reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. It could also potentially provide energy to remote or disaster-stricken areas on Earth.

5. Are there any potential drawbacks to a Power Tower in Space?

Some potential drawbacks of a Power Tower in Space include the high cost and resources required for construction and maintenance, as well as potential safety concerns and risks associated with launching and operating such a large structure in space.

Similar threads

Near solar mirror for beam propulsion and space solar power
    • Optics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Space Based Solar Power practical project
    • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
7
Views
4K
Writing: Input Wanted A dangerous space mission that requires a lot of helping hands
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
22
Views
2K
Space Shuttle, thermal energy transfer, book makes no sense
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
I Qs re aspects of the Holmdel Horn Antenna used to find the CMB
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
69
Views
6K
I Gamma radiation, photon energies and wavelength question
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
818
I Growing food in space - a 3rd concept
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
X-rays produced by Solar Flares/CMEs
    • Optics
Replies
1
Views
859
Can a Cell Phone Spin Too Fast to Communicate?
    • Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top