How to search the internet well?

In summary: Printing out the answers before a test isn't going to cut it either. There is a lot of information on these forums that is helpful, but it's not what will help you in the end.
  • #1
Slimy0233
165
48
I reckon most of the questions except HW which are asked here have been discussed in the past in some corner of the internet. I wonder what one can do to search for it effectively. Do you have any tricks up your sleeve which you use when you feel like you are not getting discussions you should be getting while you search for it on the internet?
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Slimy0233 said:
I reckon most of the questions except HW which are asked here have been discussed in the past in some corner of the internet. I wonder what one can do to search for it effectively. Do you have any tricks up your sleeve which you use when you feel like you are not getting discussions you should be getting while you search for it on the internet?
PF Search top right is a good place to start.

Tick “Titles only,” is my advice.

If it is Einstein related, or size/age of the universe, BB, Black holes, you will get a stack of hits.

A member may post a link of a relevant thread if they are about so you can read through first.

There are also insights articles, “insights blog” top menu next to forums.

Wiki is fairly decent on mainstream science, biology, chemistry, biochemistry and a lot of physics topics but tread carefully.

I do not think it is that bad but I am not a physicist!
 
  • Informative
Likes Slimy0233
  • #3
Slimy0233 said:
Do you have any tricks up your sleeve which you use when you feel like you are not getting discussions you should be getting while you search for it on the internet?
The problem is often not that you do not get results that you want from a search, but that you do get a lot of results you don't want. You need to train yoursef to ignore the clickbait (e.g. the second hit on a search for "Casimir effect": "The Casimir effect: a force from nothing. The attractive force between two surfaces in a vacuum - first predicted by Hendrik Casimir over 50 years ago - could affect everything from micromachines to unified theories of nature."

Instead of being seduced by this pap, choose a link from one of the many reputable sources given: even Wikipedia (although as @pinball1970 says, be careful - welll-referenced stuff in the main paragraphs of an article are usually OK but be careful with something like
Constructed within the framework of quantum field theory in curved spacetime, the dynamical Casimir effect has been used to better understand acceleration radiation such as the Davies-Fulling-Unruh effect.[citation needed]

If you are struggling to turn up anything sensible, restrict your search to a particular quality site by using e.g. "casimir effect site:nature.com".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Slimy0233 and russ_watters
  • #4
Here are some tricks for technical searches, i.e. if you know the name of a field or theorem:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-any-occasion.1016388/

If you are looking especially for "discussions on the internet", I would answer "Don't!". How will you solve the problem of not running into crackpot discussions? The only addresses I know of that are acceptable are
  1. PF : https://www.physicsforums.com/search/ (advanced search option)
  2. SE : https://stackexchange.com/ (physics and other sciences)
  3. SO : https://stackoverflow.com/ (advanced version of SE)
  4. Arxiv : https://arxiv.org/ (pre-prints and papers)
Generally, I always try to find information on university servers. That restricts me mainly to lecture notes, but they are at least reliable.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Math100, Slimy0233 and pbuk
  • #6
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #7
Slimy0233 said:
What brilliant treasure trove you have lead me to!
I think I have forgotten nLab in case you want to win a mathematical argument by the superior choice of words. It is an absolutely reliable source for mathematical definitions, however, mainly from the standpoint of category theory. (We say here: "shooting down sparrows with canons".)
 
  • Care
Likes Slimy0233
  • #8
fresh_42 said:
If you are looking especially for "discussions on the internet", I would answer "Don't!".
This.

Further, the OP has set himself the goal of learning the entirety of a BS in physics in 8 months - with perhaps a little more than 6 remaining. He should be hitting the textbooks, and not "looking for discussions on the internet."

I would even include PF to a degree. Being able to solve a problem, once it's been posted here and a half dozen people have helped with it is not going to be what is tested for.
 
  • Like
Likes Rive and sophiecentaur
  • #9
Slimy0233 said:
Do you have any tricks up your sleeve which you use when you feel like you are not getting discussions you should be getting while you search for it on the internet?
Yep. Skimming through discussions is good to find the right words to search for, thus: learning the 'language' of the question you are looking for, but that's all it is good for.

If you stop at discussions, you just miss the knowledge. When you finally have the right words, keep on searching till valid references turns up.
 
  • Care
Likes Slimy0233

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
710
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
891
Replies
15
Views
550
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
2
Views
497
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top