mfb said:
I can imagine how difficult moderation was at that time.Greg Bernhardt said:
Moderation was different at that timeWrichik Basu said:
vxiaoyu18 said:
Greg Bernhardt said:
Wrichik Basu said:
..., in other words, "Thanks for the suggestions, but they've been tried before, and declared failures."Greg Bernhardt said:
Hello Greg,Greg Bernhardt said:
troglodyte said:
Indeed, where exactly is the link though?troglodyte said:
Pls,correct me but it should be the following one:Greg Bernhardt said:
Where is the PF link in your profile?troglodyte said:
Is it because the threads that you want to post in are all very old? Or were they closed because they violate the PF rules? Can you post links to a couple of them?eltodesukane said:
Like this one:berkeman said:
Yeah, there are times when a potentially interesting discussion reveals that the OP has issues with science or reality, and since it's the OP's thread, it ends up getting closed. In such cases, if you think there is an interesting discussion still to be had on the subject aside from the problems introduced by the OP, you have the option to start a new thread to get a better discussion going.eltodesukane said:
It is indeed useless for useless discussions like a person's nervousness. If you want e.g. to discuss Webb, then reference the mission statement, the differences to other probes etc. This way it would be a useful discussion If you want to talk about the weather, then PF is indeed not the place to go. I recommend fb.eltodesukane said:
These are quality shirts. When did these first became available? Anyway, I've worn mine for many years now.Greg Bernhardt said: